have a court case to discuss

found some interesting court cases so lets talk about them coz im in the mood to theorise and im bored

imo here everyone was negligent. the guy who ran into the train with a dangerous package was liable obviously due to his carelessness with a dangerous package in hand. The guy who pushed him is liable because it was dangerous to push someone near a train whether the person had a dangeorus package or not! what if he spun when he fell and fell to the side of the train and got wept under it and died? also who doesn't expect a bomb on a train of all things? trains have been attacked by bombs and cowboys and who know what else every since they were first invented so it should be reasonable to assume the train station would and should have rules for potential bomb safety which DOESN'T include having a crowded area right next to the train with a giant heavy object which can crush a person nearby and pushing people onto the train! there should have been no heavy object there in the first place if it was at risk of being knocked over especially in a crowded area where people are most at risk. we wouldn't have this aruguement nowadays because we wouldn't make a senario this dangerous int he first place. this is why safety precautions exist. so i say every single person here owes the lady money. screw the court! what do you think?